Skip to content

Sharing successes, challenges and daily happenings in the Department of Medicine

Medicine Matters Home Article of the Week Expected effects of adopting a 9 month regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a population modelling analysis

Expected effects of adopting a 9 month regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a population modelling analysis

ARTICLE: Expected effects of adopting a 9 month regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a population modelling analysis.

AUTHORS: Emily A KendallAnthony T Fojo, David W Dowdy

JOURNAL: Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Dec 16. pii: S2213-2600(16)30423-4. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30423-4. [Epub ahead of print]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In May, 2016, WHO endorsed a 9 month regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis that is cheaper and potentially more effective than the conventional, longer (20-24 month) therapy. We aimed to investigate the population-level implications of scaling up this new regimen.

METHODS: In this population modelling analysis, we developed a dynamic transmission model to simulate the introduction of this short-course regimen as an instantaneous switch in 2016. We projected the corresponding percentage reduction in the incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis by 2024 compared with continued use of longer therapy. In the primary analysis in a representative southeast Asian setting, we assumed that the short-course regimen would double treatment access (through savings in resources or capacity) and achieve long-term efficacy at levels seen in preliminary cohort studies. We then did extensive sensitivity analyses to explore a range of alternative scenarios.

FINDINGS: Under the optimistic assumptions in the primary analysis, the incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in 2024 would be 3·3 (95% uncertainty range 2·2-5·6) per 100 000 population with the short-course regimen and 4·3 (2·9-7·6) per 100 000 population with continued use of longer therapy-ie, the short-course regimen could reduce incidence by 23% (10-38). Incidence would be reduced by 14% (4-28) if the new regimen affected only treatment effectiveness and by 11% (3-24) if it affected only treatment availability. Under more pessimistic assumptions, the short-course regimen would have minimal effect and even potential for harm-eg, when 30% of patients are ineligible for the new regimen because of second-line drug resistance, we projected a change in incidence of -2% (-20 to +28). The new regimen's effect was greater in settings with more ongoing transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, but results were otherwise similar across settings with different levels of tuberculosis incidence and prevalence of multidrug resistance.

INTERPRETATION: The short-course regimen has potential to substantially lessen the multidrug-resistant tuberculosis epidemic, but this effect depends on its long-term efficacy, its ability to expand treatment access, and the role of second-line drug resistance.

FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

For a link to the full article, click here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213260016304234

Link to abstract online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27989591

nv-author-image

Kelsey Bennett