Skip to content

Medicine Matters

Sharing successes, challenges and daily happenings in the Department of Medicine

Medicine Matters Home Article of the Week Effectiveness and implementation of decentralized, community- and primary care-based strategies in promoting hepatitis B testing uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness and implementation of decentralized, community- and primary care-based strategies in promoting hepatitis B testing uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ARTICLE: Effectiveness and implementation of decentralized, community- and primary care-based strategies in promoting hepatitis B testing uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AUTHORS: Thanh Van Kim, Trang Ngoc Doan Pham, Paul Phan, Minh Huu Nhat Le, Quan Le, Phuong Thi Nguyen, Ha Thi Nguyen, Dan Xuan Nguyen, Binh Trang, Chelsea Cao, Ahmet Gurakar, Christopher J. HoffmannDoan Y Dao

JOURNAL: eClinicalMedicine: Volume 76, October 2024, 102818

Abstract

Background: Expanding chronic hepatitis B (CHB) testing through effective implementation strategies in primary- and community-care setting is crucial for elimination. Our study aimed to determine the effectiveness of all available strategies in the literature and evaluate their specifications and implementation outcomes, thereby informing future programming and policymaking.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023455781), searching Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL databases up to June 05, 2024, for randomized controlled trials investigating primary- and community-care-based implementation strategies to promote CHB testing. Studies were screened against a priori eligibility criteria, and their data were extracted using a standardized protocol if included. ROB-2 was used to assess the risk of bias. Implementation strategies' components were characterized using the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework. Random-effect models were applied to pool the effectiveness estimate by strategy. Mixed-effect meta-regression was employed to investigate if effectiveness varied by the number of strategy's BCW components.

Findings: 7146 unique records were identified. 25 studies were eligible for the review, contributing 130,598 participants. 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were conducted in low-and-middle-income countries. Implementation outcomes were reported in only ten studies (40%). Community-based strategies included lay health workers-led education (Pooled Risk Difference = 27.9% [95% Confidence Interval = 3.4–52.4], I2 = 99.3%) or crowdsourced education on social media (3.1% [−2.2 to 8.4], 0.0%). Primary care-based strategies consisted of electronic alert system (8.4% [3.7–13.1], 95.0%) and healthcare providers-led education (HCPs, 62.5% [53.1–71.9], 27.5%). The number of BCW-framework-driven strategy components showed a significant dose-response relationship with effectiveness.

Interpretation: HCPs-led education stands out, and more enriched multicomponent strategies had better effectiveness. Future implementation strategies should consider critical contextual factors and policies to achieve a sustainable impact towards hepatitis B elimination targets.

For the full article, click here.

nv-author-image

Kelsey Bennett

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.