Skip to content

Sharing successes, challenges and daily happenings in the Department of Medicine

Medicine Matters Home Article of the Week Effects of Different Rest Period Durations Prior to Blood Pressure Measurement: The Best Rest Trial

Effects of Different Rest Period Durations Prior to Blood Pressure Measurement: The Best Rest Trial

ARTICLE: Effects of Different Rest Period Durations Prior to Blood Pressure Measurement: The Best Rest Trial

AUTHORS: Tammy M Brady, Jeanne Charleston, Junichi Ishigami, Edgar R Miller 3rd, Kunihiro MatsushitaLawrence J Appel

JOURNAL: Hypertension. 2021 Nov;78(5):1511-1519. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17496. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

Abstract

A rest period of 3 to 5 minutes before blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended in hypertension guidelines but can be challenging to implement. We conducted a randomized trial to determine the effects of resting for <5 minutes on BP. In a cross-over design, 113 participants (mean age 55 years, 36% male, 75% Black) had 4 sets of triplicate BP measurements with the order of rest for the first 3 sets (0 minutes, 2 minutes, 5 minutes1) randomized. The fourth set was always a second 5-minute rest period (5 minutes2), from which we calculated the difference between 5 minutes1 and 5 minutes2 (5 minutes1−5 minutes2), a measure of intrinsic BP variability. To determine if there was no difference between BPs obtained after resting 0 minutes or 2 minutes versus 5 minutes1, we tested whether 5 minutes1−0 minutes or 5 minutes1−2 minutes was within a prespecified noninferiority margin of ±2 mm Hg compared with 5 minutes1−5 minutes2. Overall, mean BP was similar across 5 minutes1 (128/75), 5 minutes2 (127/76), 2 minutes (127/74), and 0 minutes (127/74). Compared with the average absolute 5 minutes1−5 minutes2 difference (5.3/3.0 mm Hg), the absolute systolic BP difference of differences did not cross our noninferiority margin for 0 minutes rest (0.2 [95% CI, 0.8–1.2]) but did for 2 minutes rest (−1.7 [−2.8 to −0.6]). Among those with systolic BP <140, the absolute difference of differences for both 0 and 2 minutes did not cross the ±2 mm Hg margin; however, those with systolic BP ≥140 had differences that did exceed this threshold. Our findings suggest that shorter rest periods may be a reasonable alternative to 5 minutes for most individuals. Implementation could substantially improve the efficiency of hypertension screening programs.

For the full article, click here.

For a link to the abstract, click here.

nv-author-image

Kelsey Bennett